The correct identification of the subcontractor is important, as in the case of Croftport where it transpired that the subcontractor did not hold GPS. Given the verification system, this instance is unlikely to recur – the subcontractor was engaged initially before April 2007 – but it does emphasise the fact that the trading entity which has been verified should be the same as that which is being paid.

Need help? Get subscribed!

To subscribe to this content, simply call 0800 231 5199

We can create a package that’s catered to your individual needs.

Or book a demo to see this product in action.